Page 2 of 5
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:54 pm
by Chronic Liar
Galagros wrote:I have been thinking about maybe adding some additional info to the table, such as the changing of territory size between months. If someone gained territory they will get a green (+x) under the city/town/village column. If they lost territory they would get a red (-x) under the city/town/village column.
Example:
<table border=1 bgcolor=white>
<tr><td>
Ruler<td>
Cities<td>
Towns<td>
Villages
<tr><td>Burilgi Khan<td>2
(+1)<td>0<td>1
(+1)
<tr><td>Cao En<td>1<td>1
(+1)<td>0
<tr><td>Dong Ke<td>1<td>1
(+1)<td>8
(+8)
<tr><td>Du Yu Ci Mi<td>0<td>0<td>1
<tr><td>Xiang Yu<td>5
(-2)<td>9<td>27
</table>
Anyways, do you guys think this would be better?
That would actually help a lot!
Xu Shu wrote:I would suggest divinding it into rulers, town magistrates, and village heads, so that it's easier to skim through.
I agree with this, but I know that it took a very long time for you to create this thing, so if you don't do this, I won't really mind at all.
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:58 am
by Galagros
Xu Shu wrote:Actually, no one knows who rules anything. I must say, although it has a few uses, the fact that it doesn't relate location of all that information, makes it a slight waste of time in my honest opinion. One would have to look at the actual game map to see their actual location. This thing is good for telling the relative size of a ruler, but that's about it. If you want to keep it, then I would suggest divinding it into rulers, town magistrates, and village heads, so that it's easier to skim through.
The point of this isn't to know who borders who. It's meant to allow players to compare the size (or perhaps strength) of each ruler. At a quick glance you can see who is a powerhouse in China. And if I add the +/- you will be able to easily see who is expanding and who is losing ground.
I am against seperating it into City, Town, and Village rulers. A village head can easily become a town head and a town head could become a city ruler. Besides, moving them would take towns and villages out of table as a whole. If enough people complain about it I might change it, but I won't for now.
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:21 pm
by Chronic Liar
It wouldn't completely take towns and villages out of the table becuase Rulers could still own villages and towns. Town heads could still own some villages. It would take cities out of the Town heads' table and it would take both cities and towns out of the village chiefs' table.
Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 9:21 pm
by Galagros
Updated, PM me if you find that something is wrong.
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 6:05 pm
by Galagros
Updated. PM me if you notice a mistake.
Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 5:38 pm
by damon
Great work, this helps a lot!
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 4:40 pm
by Galagros
Updated. Sorry for the delay.
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:19 pm
by Chronic Liar
It seems you forgot to add my new village to the table.
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 9:16 pm
by Galagros
Sorry, I generally go off of the map thread. I either made a mathematical error or it's not up-to-date.
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 9:25 pm
by Chronic Liar
Yeah, it was a map error; the map still has Du Yu Ci Mi ruling that village.